
FDA Proposes New Sunscreen Rules
摘要:23, 2007 -- Sunscreens may get a new rating system and a warning,thanks to a new FDA proposal。 The FDA today proposed a new regulation that sets standards for formulating,testing, and labeling over-the-counter sunscreens with ultraviolet A (UVA) andultraviolet B (UVB) protection。 The prop......
Aug. 23, 2007 -- Sunscreens may get a new rating system and a warning, thanks to a new FDA proposal.
The FDA today proposed a new regulation that sets standards for formulating, testing, and labeling over-the-counter sunscreens with ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) protection.
The proposal includes a four-star rating system for sunscreen protection against UVA light, along with a warning that stresses the importance of not relying solely on sunscreens to prevent skin cancer and skin damage.
Sunlight contains the visible light that we can see and ultraviolet (UV) light that we cannot. There are two types of UV light, UVA and UVB. UVA light is responsible for tanning and UVB for sunburn. Both can damage the skin and increase the risk of skin cancer.
SPF?ratings on sunscreens refer only to UVB?protection, not UVA?protection. For years, the FDA?has been studying UVA's effects on skin, but until now hasn't required sunscreens to carry specific information on UVA?protection.
"Only a few countries have addressed UVA?protection in their product labeling,"?says Douglas Throckmorton,?MD, deputy director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
The proposed new regulation would include cosmetics that tout sun protection but not insect repellents that include SPF, according to Matthew Holman, PhD, interdisciplinary scientist team leader at the FDA's?Office of Nonprescription Products.
New UVA Sunscreen Ratings
The FDA's proposed sunscreen regulation is designed to be a consumer-friendly rating system for identifying the level of UVA protection offered by a product.?It rates UVA sunscreen products on a scale of one to four stars.
One star would represent low UVA protection, two stars would represent medium protection, three stars would represent high protection, and four stars would represent the highest UVA protection available in an over-the-counter sunscreen product.
If a sunscreen product does not provide at least a low level (one star) of protection, the FDA is proposing to require that the product to bear a “no UVA protection” marking on the front label near the SPF value.
The UVA ratings would be based on two tests the FDA proposes to assess the effectiveness of sunscreens in providing protection against UVA light. One would be a lab test that measures a product's ability to reduce the amount of UVA?radiation that passes through it. The other test would be conducted on people, checking the product's ability to prevent tanning. This test is nearly identical to the SPF test used to determine the effectiveness of UVB sunscreen products.
If a sunscreen?scores higher on one test than the other, it would bear the lower rating, says Holman.
The proposal also includes tweaking the SPF information on sunscreens. For instance, a sunscreen that currently says "SPF?45" would say "UVB?SPF 45"?with the word "high"?to indicate a high level of UVB?protection.
To see an example of what the new labeling would look like, visit the FDA's web page on the proposed sunscreen labeling at http://www.fda.gov/consumer/updates/sunscreen082307.html.
New Sunscreen Warning
The FDA also proposes requiring all sunscreens to include a "Warnings" statement in the "Drug Facts" box.
The warning would say: "UV exposure from the sun increases the risk of skin cancer, premature skin aging, and other skin damage.? It is important to decrease UV exposure by limiting time in the sun, wearing protective clothing, and using a sunscreen." The warning is intended to increase awareness that sunscreens are only one part of a sun protection program.
The proposed new sunscreen regulation will also stress instructions to reapply sunscreen at least every two hours and to use sunscreen as directed, says Holman.
The FDA will accept comments on the proposed new rule for 90 days, ending on Nov. 26, 2007.
?
发布日期:2007-8-27
- Younger Age, Faster Breast Cancer Growth
- White House Warns of Pot-Depression Link
- Banishing Wrinkles With Fillers
- Body Contouring Surgery Improves
- Acrylamide in Diet: Cancer Risk?
- Aging Hands? Docs Put Beauty Within Reach
- Panel: New Tools Help Smokers Quit
- Few Aware of Stroke Warning Symptoms
- Gamma Knife Snips OCD in Bud
- Ginseng May Help Treat Schizophrenia
- Olympics in Beijing: Air Quality Woes
- The Olympic Diet of Michael Phelps
- Fish Oil, Red Yeast Rice Cut Cholesterol
- Watermelon: A Natural Viagra?
- Home Blood Pressure Kits: Quality Varies
- Soy Foods, Sperm Concentration Link?
- Microchip Detects Tumor Cells in Blood
- Exercise in a Pill? Maybe
- Dimebon Shines as Alzheimer‘s Therapy
- Enhanced Gummy Bears Fight Cavities


